Systemic Barriers in Northern Ontario’s Arts Sector Under the Ministry of Northern Development and the Northern Services Boards Act
Executive Summary:
This draft report critically examines the systemic, policy, and structural barriers within the Northern Ontario arts sector, with a specific focus on the impact of policies enacted by the 45 Local Services Boards (LSBs) under the significant influence of the Ministry of Northern Development. The analysis reveals that the current legislative and policy environment actively impedes the sustainability and viability of artists and arts organizations in the Far North and the broader Northern Ontario region.
Key findings highlight significant funding disparities favoring southern Ontario, substantial deficits in arts infrastructure across the north, and legislative restrictions imposed by the Northern Services Boards Act that fail to recognize the intrinsic economic and social value of the arts. Governance challenges within Northern arts organizations, exacerbated by isolation and limited resources, further compound these issues. The report concludes with actionable recommendations for policy and structural reforms aimed at fostering a more supportive and sustainable ecosystem for the arts in Northern Ontario.
Introduction: The State of the Arts in Northern Ontario:
The arts and culture sector in Northern Ontario holds immense intrinsic value, reflecting the rich tapestry of heritage and contemporary expressions unique to its diverse communities, including the vital contributions of Indigenous cultures. Beyond its cultural significance, the arts possess substantial potential as a catalyst for economic diversification and the enhancement of community well-being in a region historically dependent on often-precarious resource extraction industries.
As global economic shifts have introduced instability to traditional sectors like forestry and mining, the arts and culture sector has garnered increasing attention for its capacity to redefine community through creative placemaking initiatives. These initiatives can lead to an improved quality of life, enhance the attractiveness of the region, and foster the emergence of place-based creative economies throughout Northern Ontario.
However, this report posits that the current policy and structural landscape, particularly the role and influence of Local Services Boards (LSBs) operating under the purview of the Ministry of Northern Development, actively obstructs the realization of this potential. This analysis aims to identify the specific systemic, policy, and structural barriers imposed by this environment, to thoroughly examine their detrimental impact on artists, arts organizations, and the broader cultural ecosystem of Northern Ontario, and ultimately, to propose concrete solutions for policy and structural reforms that can cultivate a more supportive and thriving environment for the arts in the region.
Legislative and Policy Framework: The Northern Services Boards Act and the Arts:
The Northern Services Boards Act (NSBA) serves as the foundational legislation governing the establishment and operation of Local Services Boards in the unincorporated areas of Northern Ontario.
Enacted in 1979, the NSBA was initially intended to streamline the delivery of essential community services to residents in these geographically dispersed regions.. Under this Act, LSBs are established as voluntary organizations empowered to deliver a combination of nine specifically approved services.
However, a critical examination of the NSBA reveals a significant limitation in its perception and classification of arts-related activities. These activities are often categorized as “prohibited economic development”. This classification reflects a fundamental misunderstanding or an outright undervaluation of the arts as a legitimate and vital economic driver within the Northern Ontario context.
The NSBA’s original design and ongoing interpretation prioritize basic infrastructure and essential services, overlooking the significant economic contributions that a thriving arts and culture sector can generate. This misclassification effectively prevents artists and cultural workers from accessing crucial funding and resources that are readily available to support other sectors recognized as legitimate avenues for economic growth. Consequently, the legislation undermines efforts to establish sustainable arts programs and actively discourages essential investment in arts infrastructure across the region.
Furthermore, the NSBA outlines a limited scope of powers for LSBs, primarily focusing on fundamental services such as water supply, fire protection, garbage collection, sewage management, street lighting, recreation, road maintenance, public library services, and emergency telecommunications.
Notably absent from this list of core responsibilities is any explicit mention or provision for arts and culture. While the term “recreation” might be interpreted broadly in some contexts, its application within the NSBA framework typically leans towards sports, leisure activities, and the maintenance of recreational facilities, often marginalizing or entirely excluding artistic and cultural pursuits. This exclusion from the core mandate of LSBs signifies a systemic lack of recognition regarding the importance of arts and culture to the overall well-being and economic vitality of Northern Ontario communities.
Additionally, LSBs operate under specific limitations concerning their engagement with broader economic development and community planning initiatives, particularly as they relate to the arts. They are authorized only to comment on or provide consent to matters that fall directly within their designated powers, and economic development planning and building planning are typically considered outside this defined scope.
This inherent limitation effectively prevents LSBs from actively fostering and supporting the growth of the arts sector within their respective jurisdictions. Without the explicit authority to engage in economic development planning that encompasses the arts, LSBs are unable to implement targeted strategies aimed at attracting artists, supporting arts organizations, or integrating arts and culture into overarching community development initiatives.
Recent efforts have been made to modernize the NSBA, aiming to enhance its clarity and reduce administrative burdens. However, these amendments primarily address aspects such as fire service provisions, regulations for closed meetings, and financial reporting procedures. There is no clear indication that these modernization efforts have tackled the fundamental issue of the NSBA’s classification of arts-related activities or expanded the powers of LSBs to include explicit support for arts and culture.
Consequently, while administrative processes may see improvements, the underlying systemic barriers posed by the NSBA’s limited scope and exclusionary classification of the arts appears to remain largely unaddressed.
The Role and Influence of Local Services Boards:
Local Services Boards in Northern Ontario operate as distinct entities with a defined structure and governance framework. These boards are typically comprised of elected volunteer members, with the size of the board being either three or five individuals.
These members serve relatively short terms of one year (three years beginning in 2025), highlighting the grassroots and community-driven nature of these organizations. Operating within specific geographic boundaries, LSBs are authorized to exercise only those powers that have been explicitly designated to them by an order from the Minister of Northern Development.
This ministerial oversight underscores the significant influence that the Ministry exerts on the policies and priorities of LSBs. The Ministry holds the ultimate responsibility for the NSBA, overseeing the very establishment of LSBs, defining the scope of their powers, and even managing their dissolution when necessary. Furthermore, the Ministry plays a crucial role in providing guidance to LSBs on various operational matters and retains the authority to approve any proposed changes to the services they offer or the geographic areas they serve. This centralized control and oversight by the Ministry of Northern Development significantly shape the operational framework within which LSBs function. The Ministry’s priorities and directives can inadvertently reinforce a focus on the delivery of basic, essential services, potentially leading to the marginalization or neglect of sectors like arts and culture, which are not perceived as falling within this core mandate.
LSBs in Northern Ontario often contend with a unique set of challenges, most notably limited financial resources and a primary focus on delivering essential services to their communities. These local boards typically operate with constrained budgets, relying on a combination of user fees collected from residents, local fundraising initiatives, and operating grants received from the provincial government. The long-term sustainability of LSBs is an increasing concern in many Northern Ontario communities, particularly due to factors such as declining permanent resident populations and the escalating costs associated with delivering essential services.
Given these financial realities and the fundamental responsibility of providing core services like safe drinking water and effective waste management, arts and culture often take a backseat in the list of priorities for LSBs. The limited resources available are typically directed towards these essential functions, leaving little capacity or funding to support arts and culture initiatives, which are not considered core services under their current mandate.
When comparing the powers and limitations of LSBs to those of municipalities in Ontario, a significant disparity in their ability to support arts and culture becomes evident. Municipalities, operating under the broader legislative framework of the Municipal Act, possess a wider range of powers, including explicit jurisdiction over “culture, parks, recreation and heritage”.
This legislative empowerment allows municipalities to establish dedicated arts departments, allocate funding through their municipal budgets specifically for arts and culture, and integrate arts and culture into their overall community development plans. Furthermore, municipalities have the authority to create local boards for institutions like public libraries and other cultural organizations, demonstrating a greater capacity for direct and sustained support of the arts.
In stark contrast, LSBs, with their limited mandate and focus on basic services, lack this same level of legislative empowerment and financial flexibility to directly support and develop arts and culture within their communities. This fundamental difference in their governing frameworks results in a significant divergence in their ability to prioritize and invest in the arts as integral components of community life. The limited local governance in LSB areas has demonstrably contributed to a decline in arts infrastructure across Northern Ontario.
The frequent classification of arts-related activities as “prohibited economic development” under the NSBA actively discourages any potential investment in the physical infrastructure needed to support a thriving arts sector within these communities.
Consequently, LSBs, lacking both the mandate and the dedicated financial resources, are often unable to prioritize the development of essential creative spaces such as studios, performance venues, and exhibition galleries. This scarcity of appropriate facilities further hinders the growth and sustainability of the arts in LSB areas, creating a significant barrier for artists seeking to create, produce, and present their work within their own communities.
Systemic Barriers to Sustainability and Viability:
The Northern Ontario arts sector faces a multitude of systemic barriers that significantly impede its sustainability and long-term viability, particularly within the 45 Local Services Board areas. These barriers manifest in various forms, including pervasive funding disparities, substantial deficits in essential infrastructure, and the challenges posed by the region’s inherent geographic isolation.
Funding Disparities:
A persistent and significant disparity exists in the allocation of arts funding to Northern Ontario, especially when compared to the southern parts of the province. Data from both the Canada Council for the Arts and the Ontario Arts Council (OAC) consistently reveal alarmingly low levels of funding directed towards the region, particularly the Kenora-Kiiwetinoong area and the broader Far North Region.
For instance, the Kenora-Kiiwetinoong area received a mere 0.08% to 0.34% of the total provincial funding from the Canada Council for the Arts between 2021 and 2024, while the OAC’s Far North Region secured only 0.37% to 0.44% of the total OAC funding during the same period.
In the fiscal year 2023-2024, a stark illustration of this underfunding is evident in the fact that only three projects located in the Kenora-Kiiwetinoong area received grants from the Canada Council for the Arts, representing a minuscule 0.08% of the total funding allocated across Ontario.
This consistent pattern of underinvestment creates a significant obstacle to the growth and long-term sustainability of a vibrant arts community throughout Northern Ontario. The limited financial resources available severely restrict the ability of individual artists to sustain their creative practices, and arts organizations are left struggling to develop the necessary infrastructure, provide adequate mentorship, or effectively engage with their communities.
This lack of adequate funding perpetuates a cycle of limitation, where artists in the region are constrained by the absence of essential resources, making it exceptionally difficult for them to not only survive but to truly thrive in their chosen fields. Artists residing in remote areas like Kenora face particularly acute challenges in accessing OAC grants due to these pronounced funding disparities, which are often compounded by the region’s geographic isolation, underdeveloped infrastructure, and a notable lack of robust professional networks and mentorship opportunities.
The increased transportation costs associated with their remote location, coupled with limitations in essential facilities such as performance venues, studios, and galleries, further exacerbate the difficulties faced by local artists in participating in and benefiting from funded initiatives.
Moreover, the absence of strong professional connections and readily available mentorship makes it considerably harder for artists in these areas to receive the guidance necessary for crafting competitive grant applications and accessing other crucial resources that could support their artistic development and career advancement.
While the Ontario Arts Council has publicly stated its commitment to ensuring equitable access to funding for all artists across the province, including those living in regions outside of Toronto, the consistently low funding allocations to the Far North Region and the Kenora-Kiiwetinoong area strongly suggest that this commitment has not yet translated into tangible funding equity for these underserved communities.
Despite the OAC’s recognition of artists living outside Toronto as a priority group, the persistent and significant funding gap indicates that systemic barriers or other underlying factors continue to impede the equitable distribution of resources to this vital part of the province.
Table 1: Arts Funding Disparities in Kenora-Kiiwetinoong and the Far North Region (2021-2024)
| Fiscal Year | Funding Body | Region | % of Total Ontario Funding | Number of Projects Funded |
| 2023-2024 | Canada Council for the Arts | Kenora-Kiiwetinoong | 0.08% | 3 |
| 2022-2023 | Canada Council for the Arts | Kenora-Kiiwetinoong | 0.34% | 6 |
| 2021-2022 | Canada Council for the Arts | Kenora-Kiiwetinoong | 0.15% | 5 |
| 2023-2024 | Ontario Arts Council | Far North Region | 0.37% | 20 |
| 2022-2023 | Ontario Arts Council | Far North Region | 0.44% | 36 |
| 2021-2022 | Ontario Arts Council | Far North Region | 0.41% | 34 |
Data compiled from https://artsincubator.ca/reports/2021-2024-far-north-and-northwestern-ontario-art-statistics/
Infrastructure Deficits:
The sustainability and vibrancy of the Northern Ontario arts sector are further compromised by significant deficits in essential arts infrastructure, including a scarcity of dedicated creative spaces, adequately equipped performance venues, and accessible art galleries. Research conducted within the region clearly indicates that this limited cultural infrastructure, spanning the entire continuum from artistic creation and production to marketing, consumption, and financing, serves as a major impediment to the sector’s overall visibility, vitality, and long-term viability.
Communities across Northern Ontario have historically faced a notable lack of dedicated spaces specifically designed and equipped for artistic activities. This scarcity directly impacts artists by hindering their ability to effectively create, produce, and present their artistic work to the public, ultimately limiting the sector’s capacity to grow and flourish.
The research further underscores the critical need for a diverse range of creative spaces tailored to the specific requirements of various artistic disciplines, including private discipline-specific studios, versatile exhibition areas, and adaptable multi-disciplinary hubs. The current lack of suitable and affordable spaces across these different artistic forms acts as a significant restriction on the sector’s potential for growth and innovation. For example, the underutilization of artistic capacity in areas such as music, theatre, heritage, and visual arts is directly linked to the limited availability of appropriate and accessible creative spaces where artists can practice, rehearse, and showcase their talents.
While there have been some positive efforts to address these pressing infrastructure needs in recent years, such as the Ontario government’s decision in 2014 to lift a long-standing moratorium on the construction of new art galleries and museums, and the introduction of funding programs like the federal Canada Cultural Spaces Fund, which provided matching funds through the province’s Northern Ontario Heritage Fund Corporation for cultural facility development, significant gaps likely persist, particularly in the more remote and sparsely populated Local Services Board areas of Northern Ontario. Despite these encouraging initiatives, the sheer vastness of the region and the unique infrastructure requirements of remote LSB communities suggest that considerable challenges in this area likely remain.
Geographic Isolation and Accessibility:
The inherent geographic characteristics of Northern Ontario, including its remote location, the vast distances separating communities, and the generally low population density, create substantial barriers for both individual artists and arts organizations operating within the region.
The increased transportation costs associated with these long distances make it considerably more difficult and expensive for local artists and arts organizations to actively participate in and fully benefit from funded initiatives and broader sector activities. Furthermore, the expansive geography and relatively low concentration of population often result in a smaller number of artists and arts organizations being located within specific areas, which can lead to fewer project submissions for available grants and potentially lower levels of competition for those limited resources.
The geographic and social isolation prevalent in many Northern Ontario communities also restricts access to crucial professional development opportunities and external support networks that are often readily available in more urbanized areas. This isolation can hinder the implementation of best practices in governance and management within arts organizations and limit the opportunities for artists to connect with mentors and collaborators.
Moreover, the impact of limited internet and communication infrastructure in many parts of Northern Ontario cannot be overstated, as it significantly hinders collaboration among artists and organizations and impedes the effective dissemination of vital information about funding opportunities and other sector news. The lack of reliable connectivity further isolates the arts community in these remote areas and restricts their access to online resources that are increasingly essential for participation in the broader arts landscape. Consequently, artists and arts organizations operating within LSB areas often experience a profound sense of disconnect from the broader Ontario arts sector due to this pervasive isolation.
Research indicates that many artists and organizations in Northern Ontario feel as though they are a separate community within a larger community, highlighting the significant challenges they face in fully integrating with and benefiting from the opportunities available within the provincial arts scene. This combination of physical distance, limited communication infrastructure, and a lack of strong professional networks contributes to a feeling of being marginalized and disconnected, ultimately hindering their ability to thrive and contribute to the broader cultural landscape of Ontario.
Policy Obstructions and Neutralization:
Beyond the broad classification of arts as prohibited economic development, specific policies enacted by Local Services Boards can actively obstruct the development and long-term sustainability of the arts sector within their jurisdictions. These policies, often shaped by the LSBs’ primary focus on delivering basic essential services, may inadvertently or intentionally fail to prioritize or allocate adequate resources for arts and culture initiatives.
Ontario’s lack of consideration for the specific requirements of the arts sector can create significant hurdles for artists seeking to establish their practices and for organizations aiming to present artistic programming within their local communities. Furthermore, these policies can inadvertently or intentionally neutralize the substantial potential of the arts to contribute to both economic and community development within Northern Ontario. In failing to recognize and support the inherent economic and social benefits that a vibrant arts sector can generate, Ministry of Northern Development policies may fall short of actively encouraging or even inadvertently discourage arts-related initiatives that could otherwise contribute significantly to local economies through tourism, the attraction and retention of skilled talent, and the overall enhancement of community vibrancy.
The lack of official recognition of the arts as a legitimate economic driver often translates into a corresponding lack of investment in essential cultural infrastructure and vital arts programming at the local level. This absence of support can effectively neutralize the potential positive impacts that a thriving arts sector could have on the economic and social fabric of LSB communities.
A contributing factor to these policy obstructions may be a lack of consistent and meaningful consultation with the arts sector when developing regional policies. Research suggests that artists and arts organizations in Northern Ontario often feel undervalued and underutilized within their communities. The literature also highlights a critical need for stronger linkages between policy and decision-makers and the arts and culture sector. If the Ministry of Northern Development develops their policies and regulations in isolation, without actively seeking input from and engaging in dialogue with the local arts community, they may not be fully aware of the specific needs, challenges, and potential contributions of the sector. This absence of informed consultation can lead to the creation of policies that are ill-suited to the unique circumstances of artists and arts organizations, ultimately resulting in systemic barriers and a failure to leverage the significant potential of the arts for the overall benefit of the community.
Challenges in Accessing Arts Funding and Support:
Artists and arts organizations operating in Northern Ontario face a multitude of significant challenges when attempting to access crucial funding and support from bodies such as the Ontario Arts Council (OAC) and other funding organizations. One major obstacle is the often-complex nature of the application processes themselves, which can involve stringent reporting requirements and various bureaucratic hurdles.
For small-scale artists and organizations, particularly those operating with limited administrative capacity, navigating these intricate processes can be financially impractical and deeply discouraging. The scarcity of readily available local administrative support in many Northern communities further compounds these issues, frequently forcing individual artists and small organizations to manage the often-demanding grant application processes entirely on their own. This situation can lead to significant inefficiencies and increased operational costs, diverting valuable time and energy away from the core creative and community-focused work that these grants are intended to support.
Moreover, there are persistent perceptions within the Northern arts community that artists and organizations from smaller centers and unorganized communities are consistently overlooked or even undermined during the jury processes of public funding bodies.
This perception, whether entirely accurate or not, can erode trust in the fairness and transparency of the funding system and further discourage applications from the region. Standard funding guidelines established by organizations like the OAC, while intended to be applicable across the entire province, may not always adequately address the unique context and specific challenges faced by artists and organizations operating within the remote Local Services Board areas.
For instance, the eligibility requirements for certain types of funding, such as operating grants, often include criteria like formal incorporation as a not-for-profit organization and a demonstrated history of a certain level of annual revenue. These requirements can inadvertently exclude many smaller, less formally structured, or emerging arts initiatives in the LSB areas, thus limiting their access to crucial ongoing support.
Similarly, project grant guidelines may not fully take into account the inherent logistical challenges and potentially higher costs associated with planning and delivering arts projects in the geographically dispersed and often remote communities of Northern Ontario.
Finally, the requirements for submitting final reports upon completion of a funded project can also pose significant challenges, particularly for under-resourced organizations.
These reports often necessitate detailed descriptions of the undertaken activities, thorough financial accounting, and comprehensive documentation of the project’s outcomes. For arts organizations in Northern Ontario that operate with limited staff and financial resources, the administrative burden of meeting these reporting obligations can be particularly onerous, potentially diverting valuable time and energy away from their primary artistic missions.
Governance and Capacity Issues within Northern Arts Organizations:
Arts organizations operating within Northern Ontario, particularly in the Local Services Board areas, frequently encounter significant challenges related to governance, resource management, and overall administrative capacity.1 These challenges are often exacerbated by the region’s inherent geographical and social isolation, which limits access to essential professional development opportunities and external support networks. Furthermore, the scarcity of both financial and human resources places a considerable strain on the operational capabilities of these organizations.
Research indicates that ineffective governance and poor resource management are prevalent issues within the Northern arts sector, contributing to a broader capacity crisis. Many arts organizations in the region rely heavily on volunteer boards of directors, which, while often deeply committed, may lack the specialized expertise or consistent availability required for effective long-term strategic planning and management.
The limited access to training and mentorship opportunities further compounds these governance challenges, making it difficult for board members and staff to implement best practices in organizational management and navigate the increasingly complex regulatory and funding landscapes. These governance and capacity issues have a direct and often detrimental impact on the overall sustainability of arts projects and the organizations themselves.
Weak governance structures and limited administrative capacity can lead to financial mismanagement, operational inefficiencies, and a reduced ability to effectively secure funding from external sources and deliver impactful artistic programming.
Organizations struggling with these internal challenges are often more vulnerable to financial instability and may find it difficult to maintain consistent operations and garner the necessary community support for their long-term survival.
A stark example of the potential consequences of governance failure within the Northern arts sector is the recent disarray experienced by the Nunavut Arts and Crafts Association. This once-prominent organization, a cornerstone for visual artists in the region, faced insurmountable debt and was plagued by poor leadership, ultimately leading to its unofficial defunct status. The closure of its administrative office and the absence of board meetings for an extended period highlight the severe governance issues that can lead to institutional decay and the loss of vital support for the arts community in remote northern regions.
This case study serves as a powerful reminder of the critical importance of strong and effective governance for the health and sustainability of arts organizations operating in the unique and often challenging context of Northern Ontario.
Comparative Analysis: Arts Support in Municipalities vs. LSB Areas:
A comparison of the governance structures in municipalities and Local Services Board areas in Ontario reveals significant differences that have a direct impact on their respective abilities to support arts and culture.
Municipalities, operating under the authority of the Municipal Act, possess a much broader range of legislative powers and often have the capacity to establish dedicated arts departments or agencies, as well as implement specific funding programs aimed at supporting local artists and cultural organizations.
In contrast, LSBs, with their limited mandate focused primarily on the delivery of basic essential services as defined under the Northern Services Boards Act, lack this same level of legislative empowerment and often do not have the dedicated resources or the explicit authority to provide direct, substantial support for arts and culture (even as recreation programs) within their communities.
This fundamental difference in their governing frameworks creates a noticeable disparity in how arts and culture are prioritized and supported at the local government level. While municipalities often recognize and actively foster the arts as integral to community development and quality of life, LSBs typically operate within a more restricted scope that may not fully encompass the broader social and economic benefits that the arts can provide.
Community Arts Councils (CACs) have the potential to play a vital role in fostering arts and culture within Northern Ontario communities, including those in LSB areas. These councils often aim to promote the arts, provide opportunities for public engagement in cultural activities, and offer support and advocacy for local artists and arts organizations. However, CACs operating in Northern Ontario frequently face a unique set of challenges that can limit their effectiveness.
These challenges include the vast geographic areas they often serve, the relatively small and dispersed populations within those areas, the significant issues of isolation that can hinder networking and collaboration, and the persistent struggle to secure adequate financial resources to support their operations and programming. Despite their potential to act as crucial connectors and advocates for the arts at the local level, the ability of CACs in Northern Ontario to fully realize this potential is often hampered by these unique regional circumstances, highlighting the need for tailored support and resources to enable them to effectively fulfill their mandate.
Recommendations for Policy and Structural Reform:
To address the systemic barriers hindering the sustainability and viability of the Northern Ontario arts sector, particularly within Local Services Board areas, several key policy and structural reforms are urgently needed at the provincial level and within the framework of the Northern Services Boards Act.
Firstly, a fundamental policy change is required at the level of the Ministry of Northern Development to reclassify arts-related activities under the NSBA. This reclassification should explicitly recognize the significant recreational and social value of the arts, moving away from the current categorization as “prohibited economic development.”
Secondly, the permitted powers of LSBs, as defined under the NSBA, should be expanded to explicitly include arts and culture as forms of recreation. This would empower LSBs to directly support local arts initiatives, allocate resources for cultural programming, and facilitate the development of essential arts infrastructure within their communities.
To foster greater collaboration and integration, the provincial government should mandate or, at the very least, strongly incentivize collaboration between LSBs and local arts organizations. This could involve the establishment of joint planning committees, the sharing of resources and facilities, and the development of coordinated strategies to support the arts. Furthermore, a comprehensive review and update of the archaic and colonial Northern Services Boards Act is essential. This review should be undertaken in close consultation with representatives from the Northern Ontario arts sector to ensure that the legislation is better aligned with the unique needs and challenges faced by artists and cultural organizations operating in the region.
In terms of structural adjustments to empower local arts initiatives and organizations within LSB areas, the establishment of dedicated arts funding streams specifically targeted at these communities is crucial.
These funding streams should acknowledge the unique challenges and specific needs of arts organizations and artists operating in remote and underserved LSB areas. Moreover, there is a pressing need to provide increased resources and support for capacity building and governance training that is specifically tailored to the context of Northern arts organizations, particularly those operating within the often-complex administrative environment of LSB areas.
To address the significant deficits in arts infrastructure, the provincial government should facilitate the development of essential creative spaces in underserved communities through targeted funding programs and strategic partnerships with local stakeholders. Finally, the creation of regional arts hubs, Arts services Organizations (ASOs) or networks across Northern Ontario could play a vital role in fostering collaboration, facilitating the sharing of resources, and providing much-needed professional development opportunities for artists and arts organizations operating across multiple LSB areas.
Considering alternative governance models that could more effectively support the arts in sparsely populated regions, the provincial government should examine successful initiatives implemented in other jurisdictions facing similar geographic and demographic challenges.
For example, the state-level arts funding models in states like Montana and Maine in the United States offer valuable insights into how arts and culture can be effectively supported in regions with dispersed populations and limited resources. Additionally, the potential for establishing regional arts councils or authorities within Northern Ontario, with dedicated funding and a clear mandate to support arts and culture across multiple LSB areas, warrants careful consideration. Finally, exploring the implementation of a “percent for art” policy at the provincial level, or specifically for major infrastructure projects undertaken in Northern Ontario, could create a sustainable and dedicated funding source for the development of public art and the support of artists throughout the region.
Advocacy and Action Plan:
To effectively address the identified systemic barriers and foster a more supportive policy environment for the Northern Ontario arts sector, a coordinated and strategic advocacy and action plan is essential.
This plan should include direct engagement with key provincial government ministries, specifically the Ministry of Northern Development and the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Gaming.
Arts advocates should present the findings of this report directly to policymakers within these ministries, clearly articulating the detrimental impacts of current policies and forcefully advocating for the specific policy changes recommended.
Collaboration with existing Provincial Arts Service Organizations (PASOs), such as CARFAC Ontario and Ontario Presents, is crucial to amplify advocacy efforts. These organizations possess valuable expertise, established networks, and a strong collective voice that can be leveraged to advocate for the needs of the Northern arts community. Raising public awareness about the significant challenges currently facing the Northern Ontario arts sector is also a critical component of any effective advocacy strategy. This can be achieved through proactive engagement with local and provincial media outlets, the organization of community forums and town hall meetings, and the implementation of targeted online advocacy campaigns to educate the public and garner broader support for policy change.
Building strong partnerships with other key sectors in Northern Ontario, such as tourism agencies and economic development corporations, will be vital in highlighting the intrinsic economic benefits that can be realized through increased investment in the arts.
Finally, the findings and recommendations of this comprehensive report should be formally presented to relevant standing committees of the Ontario legislature and during the annual pre-budget consultation processes to ensure that the urgent needs of the Northern Ontario arts sector are given due consideration at the highest levels of government.
Conclusion: Towards a Sustainable and Vibrant Northern Ontario Arts Sector:
The analysis presented in this report underscores the critical and urgent need for significant policy and structural changes to effectively address the deeply entrenched systemic barriers that continue to impede the growth and sustainability of the Northern Ontario arts sector, particularly within the numerous Local Services Board areas.
The evidence clearly demonstrates that the current legislative and policy environment, heavily influenced by the Ministry of Northern Development, deliberately fails to recognize the intrinsic recreational, cultural, social, and economic value of the arts, leading to detrimental consequences for artists, arts organizations, and the communities they serve.
However, it is crucial to reiterate the immense potential of the arts to contribute significantly to the overall cultural, social, and economic fabric of Northern Ontario. If the identified barriers are strategically and effectively removed, the arts can become a powerful driver of regional development, enhance community well-being, quality or recreation services and enrich the lives of all northerners.
Achieving this vision necessitates a concerted and collaborative effort involving all relevant stakeholders, including the provincial government, the Local Services Boards, arts organizations of all sizes, individual artists working across disciplines, and the diverse communities that comprise Northern Ontario. By working together, fostering open dialogue, and committing to implementing the necessary policy and structural reforms, a more supportive, equitable, and ultimately vibrant ecosystem for the arts can be cultivated across the entirety of Northern Ontario.
About the Author
