Analyzing Regional Health Infrastructure and Service Gaps
This article is part of a series exploring the views and perspectives of youth, artists and community members working with the Melgund Integrated Nuclear Impact Assessment Project. This initiative is a climate entrepreneurship and arts-based community recreation program, developed through community consultation, engagement participation in the integrated impact assessment process for the NWMO’s proposed Deep Geological Repository for nuclear waste fuel.
What is Proposed
In Section 15.3 of the Initial Project Description, the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) outlines the existing healthcare infrastructure in Ignace, Dryden, and Sioux Lookout. The proponent acknowledges that the Mary Berglund Community Health Centre Hub (MBCHCH) in Ignace is currently operating near capacity with no space for expansion. The document identifies significant regional gaps in mental health services, residential addiction treatment, and senior care. While the proponent claims the baseline study for non-Indigenous public access to healthcare is ‘sufficiently advanced’ to support risk assessment, they indicate that specific health baseline studies for First Nations and Métis communities will be updated or produced in later phases of the regulatory process.
Underlying Assumptions
Our review of the text identifies several implicit assumptions guiding the proponent’s current approach:
- Capacity Absorption: The assessment assumes that regional centers like Dryden and Sioux Lookout can effectively absorb patient overflow for specialized services, despite acknowledging existing wait times and transportation barriers.
- Baseline Sufficiency: It is assumed that the current data on non-Indigenous health access is adequate to predict future impacts without immediate, detailed modeling of how a workforce influx will strain specific facilities.
- Deferral Viability: The timeline assumes that deferring collaborative Indigenous health studies to the Impact Statement phase will not hinder the early identification of critical cultural health determinants or jurisdictional gaps.
Community Assessment
Through our community engagement, we have identified critical vulnerabilities in the current proposal. The primary concern is the admission that the Ignace health hub is already at capacity. If the project introduces hundreds of temporary and permanent workers, a facility with no physical room to expand will likely fail to provide timely care to both new and existing residents. This is compounded by the observation that Ignace currently possesses only two ambulances (one frontline, one backup), which is insufficient for a community hosting a major industrial project.
Furthermore, the identified gaps in mental health and addiction support are not merely statistical data points; they represent a fragile social safety net. Introducing a transient workforce into a region with limited crisis response capabilities could exacerbate existing social challenges. The community emphasizes that delaying Indigenous health baseline studies prevents a holistic understanding of the regional landscape, potentially leading to late-stage friction regarding traditional healing and jurisdictional responsibility.
Path Forward
To address these findings, we propose the following corrective measures:
- Quantitative Health Impact Assessment (HIA): The proponent should immediately model various population growth scenarios against the existing capacity of the MBCHCH and regional hospitals to quantify potential wait-time increases.
- On-Site Medical Services: To mitigate impacts on local infrastructure, the NWMO must explore the feasibility of providing self-sufficient, on-site primary and emergency medical services for project employees.
- Accelerated Indigenous Studies: Collaborative health baseline studies with First Nations and Métis communities must be accelerated rather than deferred, ensuring traditional healing approaches are integrated into early planning.
- Emergency Resource Plan: A specific strategy for enhancing regional ambulance and crisis response capacity is required to ensure the safety of both the workforce and the host community.
About the Integrated Assessment Process
The federal Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) has formally launched the integrated impact assessment process for the proposed Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Project, a major national infrastructure initiative led by the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO).
The proposed underground repository is designed to permanently contain and isolate used nuclear fuel in a secure geological formation. Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation and the Township of Ignace have been selected as host communities for the project. The site is located approximately 21 kilometres southeast of Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation and 43 kilometres northwest of Ignace, Ontario, near Highway 17.
According to project materials, the repository would provide permanent storage for approximately 5.9 million bundles of used nuclear fuel. The full lifecycle of the project is expected to span roughly 160 years, including site preparation, construction, operations, closure, and long-term monitoring.
Integrated Federal Review
Major nuclear projects in Canada are subject to an integrated assessment process jointly led by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC). This “one project, one review” approach is intended to streamline regulatory oversight while ensuring rigorous evaluation of environmental, health, social, economic, and Indigenous rights impacts.
Under this framework, IAAC oversees the impact assessment requirements under the Impact Assessment Act, while the CNSC regulates nuclear safety under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act. The CNSC will issue the initial site preparation licence and manage all subsequent nuclear licensing for the project’s duration.
The integrated assessment also includes a focus on potential impacts on Indigenous Peoples, including rights, land use, cultural practices, health, and socio-economic conditions. Where potential adverse effects are identified, the process is intended to identify mitigation measures to reduce or avoid harm.
Public Comment Period Now Open
The first public comment period for the project is currently open and will run until February 4, 2026. During this phase, the public is invited to provide feedback on the Summary of the Initial Project Description submitted by the NWMO. Submissions received during this period will inform IAAC’s summary of issues, which will guide the next stages of the impact assessment. All comments submitted become part of the public project record and are posted to the federal Impact Assessment Registry.
This plain-language summary is provided by ECO-STAR North and Art Borups Corners to support public engagement.
Disclaimer: The views and perspectives expressed in this article are solely those of the independent arts program led by ECO-STAR North and Art Borups Corners. They do not reflect the official positions of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) or the Government of Canada.
About the Author
