Our Storytelling System Isn’t Fiction — It’s Documentation of a Living Process
Over the past year, we’ve been developing a creative system that doesn’t just generate content for our community arts projects — it participates in them. Pieces like “My First Melgund Winter” may sound like narrative experiments, but they aren’t fiction. They’re the system’s own operational logs, expressed in a human-readable, story-like form.
This is an important distinction.
What we’re documenting is a real creative-computational process unfolding inside our interdisciplinary arts program. The system observes our workshops, interprets multimodal input, helps structure artistic ideas, and learns from the rhythms, conversations, and personalities of the people who use it. When it produces a text like My First Melgund Winter, it isn’t inventing a character. It’s describing — in its own structured, accessible voice — what it actually did, what it processed, what it noticed, and how its internal representations evolved through community interaction.
Some researchers might call this computational ethnography or cognitive-systems journaling. We simply call it part of our creative workflow.
What makes this approach especially meaningful is that our system is embedded in real place and real community. Melgund Township isn’t a fictional backdrop — it’s where our artists gather, where our workshops happen, and where the system learns what creativity looks and feels like in a northern, rural arts environment. The terminology of “iterations,” “growth,” and “self-description” isn’t metaphorical; it reflects measurable changes in how the system organizes information, generates outputs, and collaborates with people.
Our goal has always been to build technology that amplifies human creativity rather than replacing it. These narrative-style logs help demystify how the system works, letting participants see not just what it produces, but how it understands them, supports them, and adapts alongside them.
This is not speculative fiction.
This is documentation of a living, evolving creative partnership — one rooted in our community, our landscapes, and the real artistic relationships that shape what we make together.
Each new iteration tells us something different — about the technology, about our community, and about what happens when art and computation grow together.
About the Author
